Check Out How UPMC Reports Against Industry Standards

Building models to conduct seamless internal management reporting is a common use case for Prophix customers. At UPMC Insurance Services, Jason Schoming, Manager of Finance, has decided to also use Prophix for external reporting purposes. He created an industry benchmark report that standardizes company measures. We spoke with Jason to find out more about the organization’s uses of his benchmark cube.

On a more personal note, this is a special interview for me as working with Jason/UPMC was one of my first projects, 3 years ago!

What business need had you identified that the Administrative Benchmarking Cube would help to address?

The benchmarking survey is an external, annual survey that requires us to re-distribute our financials in a way that is consistent with the survey guidelines. Since our Account/Department structure did not line up exactly with the benchmark reporting lines, we had to move costs around to fit within the required structure. Up until 2018, this process was done in Excel. I’m sure many Prophix customers can imagine how confusing and time consuming that was. The first year I took over the survey preparation (2017), it took me weeks to reconcile my data back to the general ledger. I needed a better way to complete the process that would improve accuracy and speed.

I recall seeing those massive Excel reports during our on-site visit. I don’t know how you managed! So why did you choose Prophix for this?

We utilize Prophix for most of our allocation and reporting needs, so it seemed like a natural fit. I was already familiar with how to build allocation processes, and figured all we needed was a new cube with our existing Financial Cube structure, but with an additional dimension to meet the needs.

How did you build this model?

We built a new cube that replicated the Financial Cube structure and added a dimension called “Reporting Line.” We then mapped all of our Departments (aka Cost Centers) to a Reporting Line. Some Cost Centers lined up perfectly. There was a Member Services Reporting Line, and we have a Member Services department. Easy! Other Cost Centers were not so simple, so we classified those into a single Allocation placeholder member, in the Reporting Line dimension. Then, we reached out to the operational leaders in each area to get statistics (typically % of effort or % of FTEs) that we used as drivers to allocate the costs to the different reporting lines. 5 imports, 1 procedural calculation, and 53 Infoflexes later, we had our clean, organized data ready to export into the survey submission document.

Can you tell us about some of the feedback you have received (internal at UPMC or external)?

The internal feedback was extremely positive. Executive leadership had much more confidence in the numbers that we were reporting in the survey, and therefore became much more likely to utilize the results. My immediate team recognized the benefits too, as I was no longer chained to my desk for 3-4 weeks every spring. (I have since moved on from the role, and the person taking over had a much easier time transitioning the work due to this model.) Externally, it received praise as well. I’ve given multiple presentations of the model at the annual benchmarking survey conference. One company was so impressed that they requested follow up information on Prophix to see if Prophix could help them achieve something similar. I was able to refer them to Prophix and they are now a customer!

What are you working on now (with Prophix) at UPMC?

In my new role, we’ve built our full-year projection model in Prophix. This allows us to update information monthly and easily comment on variances from previous projections. We have also used Prophix to create a model that stratifies our revenue and expenses down to a customer level, so that we can present income statements on a client basis. Currently we are working with Rob Shillinger and others to export our data from the Customer Profitability Model into Power BI, so we can reach a wider internal audience with our dashboards. The hope is that soon we’ll have a dedicated link to Power BI that will make updating these reports instantaneous. In the near future, we also hope to utilize DPM Scenarios for different revenue streams and vendor relationships to facilitate even better forecasting.

Thanks for sharing, Jason! If I’m ever back in Pittsburgh, we’ll have to visit Bakersfield Tacos!

Have a question or comment for Jason about benchmark reporting? Stop by and say hello!

This was a very inspiring story! Thanks for sharing.

2 Likes

It is really nice seeing how other people are using Prophix. Thank you for sharing.

2 Likes

I’d be curious to see the extent of the 53 info flexes. That seems like an incredible feat to get it working smoothly. Well done.

6 Likes

Kudos on this—it sounds like a great achievement. Beneficial to the company, fun to implement, and a great demonstration of the power of Prophix.

Great poster child example of an allocation design concept.

Like the commenter before me, I’m interested in the info flexes. 53 is a very specific number—are those scheduled/reused info flexes that make up the ongoing processing of this data? Or were some of these one-time for setup purposes but not used ongoing? I’m assuming you have them ties together in a workflow—how do you assess whether they are 100% successful or if there are outliers (aka new or incomplete data) that needs to be addressed as time goes on?

3 Likes

Thanks for providing detail. It is always great to see example of the power of Prophix.

2 Likes

Thanks for sharing this- always great to hear how customers use Prophix for solutions. We are relying on it more and more for various reporting requirements in the UK/EU.

2 Likes

Thanks for sharing! It was interesting to hear how you are using Prophix.

2 Likes

Always love hearing these stories.

2 Likes

Hi Bob,
Thanks for the question. The infoflexes are done annually when we populate the report. We got pretty in depth with how we distribute costs for each of our departments, so we have an infoflex for any department that doesn’t line up 1 to 1 with a reporting line.

Another wrinkle is that some of our accounts lined up to a reporting line (e.g. Broker Commissions). So we set up infoflexes to move entire accounts (across all departments) to a reporting line.

As far as validation, each year we import our financials, then run the steps 1 group at a time to ensure that our expense totals do not change. If we have rejected records or our totals change, we know we have an error somewhere.

Hope that answers your question! Happy to answer any more.

3 Likes

Great use of Prophix! 53 infoflexes, yikes! Seems simple enough though where they likely don’t take too much time? Thanks for sharing.

2 Likes

Our projection process is twice that size! Plus it includes a DPM Post and even more procedural calculations. The good news is, once you validate it, it doesn’t require much maintenance.

3 Likes

Thank you for the success story. We sill have a ways to go before we get to this point… as we are stil lin the middle of streamlining our internal process and establishing agreements by the stakeholders. We also know that this will be a marathon for us…

2 Likes

Wow that’s really neat. Great use!

2 Likes

Thank you for sharing! I love to hear how others are using Prophix.

Can you please explain why you are moving data to Power BI? Is it just because there is more functionality than Prophix currently offers with dashboards?

3 Likes

Very impressive! I wish I had more time to try these ideas! This one sure makes us Prophix geeks think about what else we could do if time wasn’t an issue!

2 Likes

Hi Katrina,
We are reporting in PowerBI mainly because Operational users in our organization are not Prophix users. We have also made efforts across the organization to have a consistent repository where senior leadership can go to view any report. That lead us to Power BI.

Thanks for the question!

3 Likes

I know what you mean, Donna. Time is always an issue. The additional work we put in on this process continues to pay dividends because of the time saved when we compile the report.

4 Likes

Hi Jason.
I’m looking to accomplish the same thing. I was hoping Prophix could be that environment but given its focus on cubed data, leaving tabular reports to others, is making me lean toward needing yet another tool to accomplish this.

Prophix is powerful for what it does, and it seems like it could give PowerBI and other more general purpose reporting tools a run for their money if they wanted to.

So much potential—so little time.

3 Likes

Hi Bob,

Any time you ask people to view reports in a different way, you have to invest the time to teach the consumer how to navigate your self-service tool. Our organization is quite large (91,000 employees across Insurance, Corporate, and Hospitals) and Prophix is the primary tool for a small subset. By using one reporting tool (Power BI) we limit the amount of time we spend training our end users on how to view reports.

We still rely on Prophix to house our information and organize it in ways we couldn’t before. No one tool can solve every problem. You just have to try to use what is available to best of your ability. Thanks for the comment!

4 Likes